@InProceedings{bradley:ipsc2io,
  author = {David K. Bradley and Daniel A. Reed},
  title = {Performance of the {Intel iPSC/2} Input/Output System},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Hypercube Concurrent
  Computers and Applications},
  year = {1989},
  pages = {141--144},
  publisher = {Golden Gate Enterprises, Los Altos, CA},
  address = {Monterey, CA},
  keywords = {hypercube, parallel I/O, Intel, pario-bib},
  comment = {Some measurements and simulations of early CFS performance. Looks
  terrible, but they disclaim that it is a beta version of the first CFS. They
  determined that the disks are the bottleneck. But this may just imply that
  they need more disks. Their parallel synthetic applications had each process
  read a separate file. CFS had ridiculous traffic overhead. Again, this was
  beta CFS.}
}